Looking at Belarus for answers

Freedoms are only granted at the whim of government and only to those who accept the status quo.

This is a true tale of the political activities in a country most Americans couldn’t find on a map if its location were printed in the margins. In fact, while this dictatorship is counted among the leading 100 economies in the world, (at 72) it is a socialist welfare state by every practical definition. Freedoms are only granted at the whim of government and only for those who accept the status quo. Sound familiar?

With that said, this is the report of events surrounding a political opponent to the dictator in the 2020 presidential election. The ‘opposition’ candidate had a seemingly insurmountable lead of more than 60% of the votes. Although the incumbent had ‘won’ every election over the past 26 years, it was quite clear the country was supporting a change of direction away from the established leaders in favor of an outsider.

With victory clearly apparent, the opposition candidate began to organize a transition team preparing for a peaceful transition of power. Then suddenly the “official results” were certified and the incumbent government was declared the winner. It seems the government officials charged with counting votes decided to accept exit polls results instead of bothering to actually count the votes. Protests erupted. The opposition candidate was accused of organizing the riots. The 7 members of the transition team were all either arrested or fled into exile for safety. The opposition candidate was “arrested” by masked agents, held incommunicado and then escorted out of the country to Lithuania from where a sham video was arranged in which the candidate admitted the “exit polls” were accurate and the incumbent had won.

Supporters who clearly understood the election results were fabricated protested and were arrested, tortured and held without trials – and continue to be. One trial was held for a key leader of the opposition campaign and on September 11, of 2021, this key figure was sentenced to 11 years in a penal colony for her activities against the government.

The opposition leader is now in exile. Many of the protesters remain in prison without trials, without clean livings conditions, and are thought to be subjected to torture for refusing to admit their crimes against the government. Sound familiar?

This is the story of the 2020 election in the dictatorship of Belarus. It is worth understanding these events because by changing just a few variables it could be the story of the 2020 election in the United States and the protests that followed. Regardless of which candidate you supported, 2020 was the most questionable election in American history. The disturbing parallel to the Belarus dictator’s government attacks on opposition party leaders to the Washington establishment following many of the same tactics as the dictator of Belarus is quite frightening to report. Arresting opposition party leaders, incarcerating activists who openly supported the challenger’s campaign and labeling any challenge to the establishment’s vote count as nonsense or worse is exactly and undeniably what happened in both countries.

Lukashenko party officials actually declared him the winner based on “exit polls” and saw no reason for further investigation into accusations of fraud. Sound familiar? They say politics makes strange bed fellows (no pun intended toward ,,, ,,, well, to many to mention here) but in the case of Belarus, even George Soros tweeted on August 17, 2021 that the 2020 election in Belarus was “stolen.” Is that not what many have said of the 2020 election in the Unites States?

Soros has also implored the United States and European Union to “respond more firmly” against the illegitimate president of Belarus. But it might be noteworthy here to mention that in 1997 the New York Times reported the Lukashenko government had fined the Soros Foundation operating in Belarus some three million dollars for conducting activities related to civil unrest and protests against the government. Following an investigation lasting from 1997 to 2001, the U.S. Department of State published a lengthy report on the activities of the Soros Foundation in Belarus in which conflicts between the government of Lukashenko and Soros Foundations were documented.

Having its every move monitored by the government, the Soros Foundation changed tactics and the Soros funded Open Society Foundation began supporting organizations which profess to work on behalf of human rights; although their Marxist ideology is anything but supportive of human rights. Small groups such as Abolish Frontex became headliners as Soros poured millions of dollars into the internet in Belarus and across Europe. The Marxist messages accused Europe of being founded on “colonialism, slavery and exploitation of minorities.” Sound familiar? While Abolish Frontex gained more attention by aligning and supporting the LGBT community with the “Queer Tour” through Europe, the plight of the citizens of Belarus worsened according to a Soros tweet in August of 2021. Meanwhile the creation of class and race warfare was advanced even more successfully by media covering the migration of middle-eastern refugees overwhelming many European borders.

Migrations of illegals supported by left leaning organizations claiming to be interested in human rights while the quality of life for citizens declined. Sound familiar?

And so it is that the activities of a dictatorship in a small country in the shadow of Russian tanks on the border might not have made the news much in America. But it would seem to those of us paying attention to ‘the deep state’ in Washington, that such activities are perhaps being replicated in what would be the the greatest coups in the history of the world. Sound like a problem?

Can America Survive

Foreign Influence was predicted from the start to be a problem for the Union.

Can America remain the United States?

In the years between the drafting and adoption of the Constitution of the United States, there took place the public arguments. The States had banned together to an extent that there had been formed a single military power (the Continental Army) to defeat the British and thereby establish the Union of the States. They had successfully thrown off the abusive rule of the monarchy. But in the years following the Revolutionary War, the Articles of Confederation, lacking a defined authority, had proven to be leading the States toward more rivalry and separation than unity. Thus recognizing the need for improving a central government, the Constitutional Convention was convened in May of 1787. The convention would complete its work with the draft of the Constitution in September and thus began the public debate for the acceptance of this new form of government. 

One of the most compelling arguments for acceptance of the Constitution and the never before seen organization of a government it defined was made by John Jay, author of Federalist No 2, when he writes: 

With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people–a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of governmentvery similar in their manners and customs…”

Of those commonalities perhaps the most important with respect to the formation of the United States are manners and customs which themselves are most assuredly associated with religion as well as the basis for most of the world’s nations. If this had not been the case in 1787, there is little doubt the Constitution would have been ratified by all the States. The argument can be made that the largely geographical causes for differences in manners and customs between the deep south and the northeast could have resulted in a much different federal government if one could have continued at all. 

Which brings us forward to the growing and divisive cultures of the United States in 2021. Fueled by decades long intentional destruction of religion, indeed Christianity, as a source for common manners and customs coupled with decades of divisive policies by which the federal government gives advantages to one defined group over others, the professional politicians which now define the federal government, have successfully empowered themselves as a ruling class. A class so engaged in maintaining their positions of power – regardless of political party affiliation – that they have set themselves above most laws and exempt from others. These protections nearly insure their continuation in power while allowing a diminished accountability to constituents. 

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law…

While the 14th Amendment was the logical extension of the Civil Rights Act of 2 years previous, it has nonetheless been weakened by subsequent laws and precedent court cases until today the clause is virtually considered to be archaic. And in the political climate today, the special protection from prosecution by those loyal to the majority party and vise versa for those opposed is considered to be the new normal. Instead of being the standard for protection, the 14th Amendment and the subsequent “civil rights” legislation that have followed have been used to undermine the Bill of Rights and divide the population through special applications which are punitive to one group while granting special favor to another. The effect then has been to further divide the population into smaller and smaller competitive groups striving to demonstrate their customs and manners are unique and deserve all sorts of special privileges under an ever expanding federal government. 

As the rights of one group gains more influence over the rights of other groups, the role of the federal government to be the arbitrator of disputes serves only to create more animosity between groups and strengthen the controlling powers of the federal government. Two conditions the founding founders argued could become destructive to the new form of government so dependent on the power of that government be derived from the governed, not vise versa. 

Led by the politicians seeking ever more power who have realized the value of social turbulence, violent protesters have gained favor and protection in many of America’s major cities. Property destruction, looting and disruption of services has not only been tolerated, ambitious politicians have seized the opportunity to gain the financial support of those who back these protesters by publicly excusing the violence as necessary to draw attention to “their” cause. Meanwhile, a protest against these same politicians is attacked as intolerable, and political opponents are blamed for ‘endangering” the public and called names typically reserved for the worst of mankind. Today, boarded windows on state capitols and massive fences around government buildings are rapidly becoming the new normal in America. Freedom of the design the founders had intended isn’t even on the horizon behind us today. 

But as John Jay believed the common manners and customs would help establish the proposed Union, he also believed that foreign force and influence would be dangerous and divisive. Jay considered the danger of foreign influence a greater threat than interstate rivalry as evidenced by the fact that after the introduction, the first 4 essays of the Federalist Papers addressed this issue exclusively. 

The reality of foreign influence has come into full view recently and repeatedly. The forensic examination of thousands of voting machines proved that not only were votes changed from Trump to Biden but that the overwhelming majority of the hacks came directly out of  China. Foreign influence thus was wholly responsible for the election of the President, total destruction of the voting system in America and a further deepening of the social divide that is certainly on course to destroy the Union itself. 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Hillary told US Nobody Cares

I don’t remember. I can’t recall. Who cares?

For several years I have followed the activities of the intrepid lawyers of Judicial Watch as they chipped away the lies covering the Russian collusion hoax. With each successful pursuit of damaging information through freedom of information act lawsuits, the anticipation of a smoking gun to reveal who did what or who knew about it would build my interest. Then almost as predictable as Hillary’s failure to recall, an activist bureaucrat would violate the court order and drag the process through as much legal mud as possible.

Nevertheless, time and time again Judicial Watch and their co-plaintiffs prevailed and we were rewarded with damning evidence of the criminal activities associated with Hillary Clinton and her supporters. But somehow, someway year after year those who were exposed were able to find cover behind an activists judge or traitorous ally in the “justice” department, and escape punishment.

Crises have a way of wearing us down. A new crisis will replace the old one. No matter how close the resolution might be, once the attention shifts, the fight is usually lost. In these recent years we have repeatedly watched those who are the object of investigations escape under cover of a new crisis. In spite of mountains of money and evidence that would seem insurmountable to defeat, Judicial Watch victories have been little more than talking points at fund raisers. As Hillary stated time after time in unsworn testimony, “who cares?”

Today the United States is faced with a crisis that should not be swept away. But the long history of watching the expansion of a class of people above the laws has created a numbness to recognize another criminal activity. Some have even grown to respect those who have demonstrated their ability to go unpunished. But this time the symbol of our republic, the brightest light in the shining city on the hill is going dim. The election of our representatives has been destroyed by misguided ideologues within the system and foreign operations intent on destroying even the hope of freedom throughout the world.

Year after year election integrity watchdogs joined with Judicial Watch in working to literally force states to clear their voter registration rolls of invalid names. Opposition to these efforts was well funded and entrenched deep in the democrat party. The weapons of choice to resist lawful maintenance of voter registration: name calling and violent protestors. With the establishment media blinded by their open dislike of the President, the overwhelming denial of any election fraud resounded across the country.

Once again the undeniable truth has surfaced. The absolute proof of massive election fraud has been presented by teams of highly skilled forensic scientists. The evidence cannot be denied. President Trump was not defeated by American voters. The evidence shows Trump did in fact receive millions and millions more voters’ votes than Joe Biden. Votes that were meticulously and methodically switched after being entrusted to a network of corrupted machines controlled by foreign operatives. Operatives who’s national interests are best protected by defeating Trump.

Like so many of the damning documents Judicial Watch won through expensive hard fought legal battles, the efforts by teams of investigators aligned with Mike Lindell and others have proved beyond any doubt the extent of the attack on our election. Precinct by precinct votes were methodically switched from Trump to Biden. Many of these precincts have been discovered to have had dramatic reversals. But the key to the election of Joe Biden wasn’t just the big vote dumps in the dark of night. The key was keeping the communist sympathizing democrat close enough to be able to flip the final results with relatively few votes in the popularly advertised “swing” states.

To put the fraudulent vote counts into perspective, consider the over 100,000 vote reporting stations in the U.S. have an average of just about 1,500 votes. That gives the total of 150,000,000 votes. The evidence indicates the President was receiving approximately 53% of the votes cast. This means Trump would receive almost 80 million votes and Biden would have received 47% or 70.5million. A difference of only about 9 million votes. Therefore to reduce Trump’s votes and increase Biden’s only required the reversal of 45 votes per precinct.

In his video documentary “Absolute Proof”, Mike Lindell presents forensic proof of a precinct where hundreds of Trump votes were reversed with a a handful of Biden votes. And the evidence is available for thousands of similar precincts. The conclusion is undeniable: Trump received millions upon millions more votes and won by a landslide of record proportion.

But will the fraudulent election be corrected. Does anybody care?


No Fraud

Was Your vote changed ? ( This article was posted before ‘Absolute Proof’ was released) Some of the numbers are even more staggering – millions!

Starting 11 days before the election the Democrat Secretary of State joined by the Democrat justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court illegally abolished the state’s signature verification law for voters.

After Election Day Pennsylvania tallied over 205,000 more ballots than there were voters. This means the legal voters of Pennsylvania were victims of voter fraud – more than 205,000 of legal votes were erased by votes cast by imaginary voters.

As of this writing, more than 8000 votes were counted as cast by people whose names and birth dates match people who died prior to the election. Some of these dead people actually requested absentee ballots – in one case the voter had died some 29 years ago.

More than 10,000 votes were counted despite being received after Election Day. So to make these votes countable they changed the dates – some were dated to show they were received before they were even mailed out. This isn’t a small number. More than 60,000 votes were received back before they were mailed out!

Twenty- five thousand ballots were requested by nursing home residents in one giant batch. This is what is known as ballot harvesting. Illegal.

The day after the election and one day after the state reported the number of absentee ballots that had been received, the number of absentee ballots increased by 400,000. And no one has offered any explanation about where these came from during the night. After seeing these examples Pennsylvania wanted to re certify their votes before the electoral college vote. But they can only do this with the vice-President’s approval.

In Wisconsin cites run exclusively by Democrats, over 500 unmanned, unsecured ballot drop boxes were scattered around illegally. Then for two days after they are gathered they simply disappeared only to emerge with more than 91,000 votes. Regardless of who these votes were for, they were illegally counted. Of course they were virtually all votes for Biden.

Wisconsin also counted over 170,000 absentee ballots which were not even requested with valid applications. That is illegal In Wisconsin. But since 100% of them came from Democrat areas like Milwaukee and Madison they were counted anyway.

Also in Madison, 17,000 votes were deposited in what they called “human drop boxes,.” Those are operatives stuffing ballots into duffle bags in specific opposition to a cease and desist order from the state legislature. They didn’t worry that the legislature had said not to do this. They did it anyway and the Democrats in charge of certifying the votes went right ahead and counted these tens of thousands of illegal votes.

An eyewitness giving sworn testimony under penalty of perjury described Wisconsin postal workers being instructed to backdate some 100,000 ballots.

The margin of the Biden victory in Wisconsin was less than 20,000 votes. Any one of these numerous batches of illegal votes would reverse that decision.

The margin of Biden victory votes was even smaller in Georgia than Wisconsin. As the election drew closer and it became more and more obvious the Democrats were going to lose, a deal was arranged to all but eliminate voter verification of signatures . As a result of this last minute change in the verification process, 48 of Georgia’s counties had zero absentee ballot rejections. Thousands upon thousands of ballots without one being rejected; that’s unimaginable in a fair election. If Georgia had only rejected the historically established percentage, some 45,000 of the absentee ballots would not have been counted. Biden’s margin in Georgia was just over 11,000.

Those absentee ballots should be reviewed if not for any other reason than to expose the extent of the corruption.

The absentee ballot situation was just the icing on Biden’s victory cake. In Fulton County some republican poll watchers were physically ejected from the room where ballots were being counted under the false pretense of a burst water pipe. It was a total lie. But cameras were running when Democrats pulled boxes and suitcases full of ballots from under tables. These ballots were scanned for nearly two hours without the lawfully required observers. And the time frame for this just happens to coincide with the infamous 1:34 AM ballot dump of some 100,000 votes. Of those mysterious 100,000 votes literally none were for Trump, who just hours earlier had an insurmountable lead based on percentages.

Even though Fulton County refuses to allow any examination audit of the absentee ballots, the over 10,300 identified ballots across Georgia cast by people who’s names and birthdays indicate they are deceased would drastically reduce the victory margin A margin deficit even more reduced by the illegal votes by incarcerated felons (2500+) and votes counted by voters not even listed on the state’s voter registration rolls (4500+j. The margin in Georgia was only 11,779 votes!

Voters who claim to reside at vacant lots or in commercial office buildings- illegal in Georgia- total over 18,000. But, as in Wisconsin, 88,000 ballots were cast by voters who’s registrations were illegally backdated. Criminal by even democratic standards.

In Arizona we have identified over 36,000 votes cast by non-citizens. And again we found the familiar pattern of backdating such that they were received before they were mailed. In Maricopa County alone 150,000 people were allowed to register after the registration deadline. More than 103,000 ballots were sent through electronic machines without republican observers present. And yet the county supervisor of elections is fighting the state senate request for a forensic audit of the machines.

Nevada joined the Biden camp with a margin easily erased by the 42,000 votes by people who voted twice, or the 8,000 voters who had no address on their registration at all.

But Michigan wins the corruption award for the 174,000 ballots counted without even being associated with a voter. Nobody can explain where they even came from. But the final tally in Detroit shows the turnout was 139% of registered voters.

It was 6:31 AM. Long after voting had ended with a Trump victory when those 174,000 votes suddenly appeared. Astoundingly, 94% of these mysterious votes were for Biden!

Finally, the chairman of the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, Senator Ligon, wrote, “The Dominion voting machines employed in Fulton County had an astronomical 93.67% error rate. The national average is less than 1%. But what this means is that of the 113,000 ballots cast, someone other than the voter decided who the voter intended to vote for. It Is called adjudication. That number in Fulton County came up to 106,000 out of the 113,000 and the letter continues, “There is clear evidence that tens of thousands of votes were switched from President Trump to former Vice President Biden in several counties in Georgia. For example, in Bibb County, President was reported to have 29,391 votes at 9:11 PM Eastern time. While simultaneously Vice President Biden was reported to have 17,213. Minutes later, just minutes, at the next update, these vote numbers switched with President Trump going way down to 17,000 and Biden way up to 29,391.”

Enough said!

Sedition and the Democrats

Democratic leadership should be cautious about what they wish for.

To be clear: the Sedition Act was “Aimed at socialists, pacifists and other anti-war activists,” the Act imposed harsh penalties on anyone found guilty of making false statements that interfered with the prosecution of the war, (WWI) insulting or abusing the U.S. government, the flag, the Constitution or the military” further the Act included those who advocate, teach or defend any of these acts. 1

The Sedition Act was repealed in 1921.

If the current democrat party under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have been true to anything, it is their constant abuse of the U.S. government. Add to that their never ending defense of those who abuse the flag, interfere with law enforcement and openly “teach” the ideology of socialism as superior to America’s system of democracy. It seems Pelosi believes her group can reinstate sedition to continue her own seditious activity of personal vengeful attacks on Donald Trump. But if they are in any way successful, their precedent could lead to severe losses in the democrat party leadership.

Following the election of Donald Trump the democrats began a coups effort that was no less than an all out attack on the President and the United States system of government. The initial attack began when Hillary Clinton planned, bought and executed the exposure of a fictitious report which became widely publicized as the Steele Dossier. But long before Adam Schiff organized his secret meeting room deep underground and behind heavily guarded doors, the FBI leadership was made aware that the dossier was not true. But that didn’t even slow down the democrat led coups attempt. Their co-conspirators within the FBI leadership lied to a federal judge to obtain warrants to spy on innocent Americans, then fabricated evidence supposedly obtained by the illegal surveillance to pursue attacks on the President’s friends and advisors; forcing some to chose between total destruction of their families financially and pleading guilty to crimes the government prosecutors had created.

It would seem that if we were going to have anyone charged with and prosecuted for sedition it would be the group of Democrats who have participated in the Russian collusion hoax, the attempted coup and overthrow of the president, those who supported and spoke out for the riots and if there’s anyone left in the Democrat party by the time of those folks got prosecuted I don’t think there be any leadership remaining free.

And in closing let me remind everyone that while there was ample coverage of looters, people throwing fire bombs and flares, crowds breaking windows with both private and commercial camera coverage for plenty of opportunity to identify these people by facial recognition software, no one of these rioters has been hunted down across the country and arrested and charged with crimes. In contrast, people entering the capital building, arguably doing exactly what they’re supposed to do according to the constitution, have been identified, arrested, charged and will certainly be prosecuted. Meanwhile the real anarchists continue their rampages across America without fear of prosecution because they have “justice” on their side.

1: History.com

Trump called it War

politicians who spent millions of taxpayer dollars trying to destroy the President supported the riots.

To most Americans today the name Nazi describes a comical colonel and a no-nothing sergeant; not the horrific murderers of millions of innocent people considered inferior to their so called Master Race.

There are many descriptions of the purpose of war.

For thousands of years the purpose of war may have been to kill people and destroy things until one side or the other surrendered. The more resolved the opposing forces, the greater the destruction. It would seem the better the execution by the victors the less value of the spoils.

For The United States, the purpose and execution of wars changed when we created the atomic bomb. The destruction was too great a price to pay; even for victory. While the military continues to improve on the potential of its arsenal of atomic weapons, the resolve of the politicians to permit their use has all but disappeared. Wars have become a stage on which politicians perform to demonstrate their compassion for those with an opposing ideology. Compromise has been the ultimate goal of conflict by America since the unofficial end of the the “Korean War.”

But if one side in a war continues to believe victory is possible while the other side is willing to draw a line of compromise, it has proven over the last 70 years that those who believe victory is possible will in fact win the war. Such was the case in Vietnam when the resolve of the communist was to control the country while America was willing to settle for less as they had done in Korea. The communist prevailed and today Vietnam is a united country. They are at peace. Today they are not only a trade partner, much like Japan, they are a popular tourist destination for Americans while the divided Korea remains an adversary. Were these lessons learned?

Seeking compromise with people who have a strong belief in their ideology has led us to an endless conflict in the Middle East. But the reality is America lost the war against Islam on September 11, 2001. Americans lost freedoms and the American lifestyle. Instead of recognizing the massive destruction by an enemy intent on victory under the old rules of war, our politicians refused to acknowledge defeat. And so the losses build while politicians refuse to even acknowledge we were at war. Their arrogance has led to the spending of untold wealth seeking to reach a compromise with Islam. But Mohammed believed in war. His followers believe they can defeat any and all who don’t believe as they do. The conflict continues. One only needs to check the security lines at any public venue these days to understand how completely our freedoms have been destroyed.

President Trump successfully kept the United States from initiating a new conflict overseas during his entire term. But that doesn’t mean America was not drawn further into war. The President correctly reported to the people that America was under siege – we were at war. A war being waged in our homeland. A war being waged on three fronts; in the streets of our cities, in the leftist media in the chambers of government.

While political forces aligned to undermine the President and his election, subversive forces created false narratives about how unjust America is to – everyone who would join them in their cries for “social justice.” But no one can define what “social justice” means or who will benefit if it comes about. These forces gathered followers after each conflict with police was played up as another example of how unjust our laws were to – everyone who wanted “social justice.”

The violence and destruction grew. City after city surrendered to these anarchists demands for lawless zones where equality would reign supreme without fear of police brutality. The same politicians who had spent years and millions of taxpayer dollars trying to destroy the President and the Constitution with falsified documents and perjured testimonies joined the chorus of media and celebrities vocalizing support for the protestors’ riots while strengthening their defenses and boarding up their businesses to reduce their own losses by looters.

When the President called for Americans to recognize that these self proclaimed “social justice warriors” were in fact engaged in an organized war on America, his political enemies seized the moment to decry him as having a phobia against everyone except rich white men like himself.

After a year of violent protests, property destruction and widely recorded looters running unchecked as police stood aside, President Trump was defeated in his bid for reelection. Those who had used his presidency as their excuse for protests should have cried victory. The war should have ended with the democrats taking charge of both houses of congress and the presidency.

But the riots continued in the very cities which voted for the new regime of Joe Biden and the democrats that were so supportive of the social justice warriors. Why?

Could it be those who are financing these riots are resolved to wage this war without compromise? Will the new regime even recognize these protesters as warriors seeking conquest of America?

Trump called it war. Will Joe Biden defend America or join those intent on plundering her riches?

Liberty or Safety, Can we ever have both

If Adam Schiff is not held accountable for sedition or treason the law has no value

This week has to be on of those weeks that will forever live on in controversy. Historians will argue in perpetuity whether the truth about events reported this week lies with stories written by major news outlets of the period or with facts and the evidence to support them as presented by data and documents wrestled from the bureaucracy that created them.

With so much attention on the effects of the covid-19 virus and the damaged economy, it was perhaps a perfect time for the release of transcripts of the concealed testimony given behind locked doors deep beneath the Capitol. Those hearings, created from the whole cloth of seditionists, were conducted under such cover that when duly elected members of the House of Representatives attempted to witness the proceedings, Chairman Adam Schiff (D, anti-Trump party) refused to conduct the hearing and immediately threatened the use of armed guards to clear those representatives he deemed intruders. This week we learned why. The most organized coup ever attempted, perhaps ever attempted in history, was taking place and any accidental exposure by any official called before the Skiff committee would threaten the success of the conspirators. Reports released to the media about what was contained in the testimonies is now proven false. In fact most of the released quotes were simply fiction.

The criminal activities of FBI agents and other agency operatives might have carried more headlines except for the increasing evidence of the manipulation of the country by the man-made pandemic which has claimed more destruction to the economy and liberty than any event since the great Islamic victory of September 11, 2001. That was the day a small group of attacking Muslims succeeded in creating panic across the country. Like a tsunami of fear, lawmakers were scared into erasing much of the American lifestyle. Without clear thinking congress created laws that eventually became the keystones for the abuses of power which almost succeeded in overturning the government. We will not see for some time yet when or if those exposed by the newly released transcripts will be punished.

While the crimes of some involved in the coup attempt are now a matter of record, the extent of criminal activities by those behind the covid-19 pandemic are only now being pieced together. During this week of dramatic revelations the complicity of national government and business leaders in the development and spread of the covid-19 virus has barely begun to be exposed. Even the numbers are now being questioned by the White House task force as White House Task Force Coordinator, Dr. Burke, has said she suspects the numbers released by the CDC may be exaggerated by 25% or more.

The truth vs truthful media have proclaimed that Obama did not fund the Wuhan lab where the covid-19 virus originated. And it appears that Obama did not officially approve the transfer of millions US taxpayers’ dollars to the Wuhan lab. Nevertheless the money trail leads clearly to Dr. Fauci – with or without passing through the oval office.

Then there is surfacing the connection between Bill Gates, a patent application for a microchip related to a covid vaccine, Dr. Fauci’s recommendation to shut down the brick and mortar economy and the on-line retail industry giant Amazon. This entangled network was revealed by investigators finally examining the data used to justify the destruction of the US economy. It was also learned that Gates’ so-called charity had funded the British institute Fauci claimed was the expert source cited as the justification for shutting down the country. Now of course the models cited by Fauci have proven to have been laughably wrong and the creator of the model has resigned in disgrace over a matter of violating his own isolation program.

But wait, in a seemingly unrelated event – before the stay at home orders and shut down of brick and mortar businesses – the Ferguson institute was the recipient of a huge flow of cash as the result of a 2019 purchase by Jeff Bezos (Amazon) of some 100,000 delivery vans. The purchase of such an unprecedented increase in delivery capacity is cause for further query when it was learned the purchase was tied to the same guy behind the now debunked shut down model. A year before the shut down!

As if those stories aren’t enough to keep water cooler debates fueled for years, the saga of General Flynn came to an explosive end when the Justice Department completely retracted the charges to which the general had plead guilty. This action was predicated by release of the criminal activity by operatives within the FBI with the full knowledge of then President Obama. Dropping the charges removes completely the conviction, will allow Flynn to be reinstated to rank and benefits and opens the possibility of civil action against the prosecutors involved in official misconduct.

Perhaps the quickest and most effective step President Trump could now take to further ‘drain the swamp’ would be to appoint General Flynn as director of the FBI. Such a light turned on inside that dark hole would surely send swamp dwellers scurrying like cockroaches. The big difference though is that those roaches would be running toward lucrative taxpayer funded retirements and contracts with television networks as “expert” commentators before they face consequences for their actions.

Benjamin Franklin’s words have never rung more true: “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”